Understanding Compliance Gaps
Learn what compliance gaps are and how PartnerAlly helps you identify and resolve them.
Understanding Compliance Gaps
Compliance gaps are deficiencies where your organization's practices or documentation don't fully meet compliance framework requirements. PartnerAlly uses AI to automatically identify gaps and helps you systematically address them.
What Is a Compliance Gap?
A gap occurs when:
- A required control isn't implemented
- A policy doesn't cover required topics
- Evidence is missing or insufficient
- Procedures don't match framework requirements
Example Gaps
| Framework | Gap Example | What's Missing |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | "No documented access review process" | Periodic access review procedure |
| ISO 27001 | "Incident response plan lacks escalation" | Escalation procedures in IR plan |
| HIPAA | "No BAA template identified" | Business Associate Agreement template |
| GDPR | "Privacy policy missing retention periods" | Data retention disclosure |
Gaps aren't failures—they're opportunities to improve. Every organization has gaps. What matters is how you identify and address them.
How Gaps Are Identified
AI Document Analysis
When you upload a policy or procedure document, PartnerAlly's AI:
- Reads the document - Understands content and context
- Maps to frameworks - Compares against control requirements
- Identifies gaps - Finds missing or incomplete coverage
- Scores confidence - Rates how certain the AI is about each gap
- Creates gap entries - Adds gaps to your registry
Manual Gap Entry
You can also add gaps manually:
- Gaps discovered during internal reviews
- Auditor findings
- Risk assessment results
- Security incidents revealing weaknesses
Gap Properties
Each gap has these attributes:
| Property | Description |
|---|---|
| Title | Brief description of the gap |
| Description | Detailed explanation of what's missing |
| Severity | Critical, High, Medium, or Low |
| Status | Open, In Progress, Resolved, Accepted |
| Framework | Which compliance framework it relates to |
| Control | Specific control requirement |
| Source | Document or assessment that identified it |
| AI Confidence | How certain the AI is (for AI-identified gaps) |
Severity Levels
Gaps are categorized by severity:
| Severity | Color | Typical Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | 🔴 Red | Major compliance violation, audit failure risk |
| High | 🟠 Amber | Significant deficiency, needs prompt action |
| Medium | 🟢 Green | Moderate issue, reasonable timeline to fix |
| Low | 🔵 Blue | Minor gap, address when convenient |
Severity Assignment
AI assigns severity based on:
- Framework requirements (mandatory vs. recommended)
- Control criticality (security-critical vs. administrative)
- Potential impact if not addressed
- Auditor focus areas
Gap Lifecycle
Gaps move through these statuses:
Open → In Progress → Resolved
↓
AcceptedStatus Definitions
| Status | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Open | Newly identified, not yet addressed |
| In Progress | Being worked on via workflow or task |
| Resolved | Fixed with evidence of remediation |
| Accepted | Risk accepted (documented and approved) |
Gap Locations in PartnerAlly
Access gaps from multiple places:
Gaps Page
Full list with filtering, sorting, and bulk actions.
Dashboard
Summary counts by severity on the main dashboard.
Document Details
Gaps identified from a specific document.
Control Details
Gaps related to a specific control.
Why Gap Management Matters
For Audits
- Auditors expect you to know your gaps
- Demonstrating awareness and remediation plans is valuable
- Resolved gaps show control maturity
For Security
- Gaps often represent real security risks
- Closing gaps improves your security posture
- Reduces attack surface
For Compliance Programs
- Tracking gaps shows program health
- Gap trends reveal systemic issues
- Resolution metrics demonstrate improvement
Gap vs. Risk vs. Finding
These terms are related but different:
| Term | Definition | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Gap | Missing or incomplete compliance coverage | AI analysis, assessments |
| Risk | Potential negative outcome | Risk assessments, gap analysis |
| Finding | Auditor-identified deficiency | External audit reports |
In PartnerAlly:
- Gaps can create risks
- Risks can exist without gaps
- Findings are typically added as high-severity gaps
Documentation Sections
Viewing Gaps
Filter, search, and navigate the gaps list.
Gap Details
Understanding the gap detail view.
Updating Status
Change gap status and add resolution notes.
AI Analysis
Understanding AI confidence and reasoning.
Common Questions
How many gaps is normal?
This varies widely:
- New organizations: 50-200+ gaps initially
- Mature programs: 10-30 open gaps at any time
- Audit-ready: 0 critical, few high gaps
Can I delete a gap?
Generally no—gaps are part of your compliance record. Instead:
- Mark as "Resolved" when fixed
- Mark as "Accepted" if risk-accepting
- Filter them out of views
What if I disagree with an AI-identified gap?
Review the AI reasoning:
- If the AI misunderstood, mark as resolved with explanation
- If partially valid, adjust severity
- Provide feedback to improve future analysis
Next Steps
- Viewing Gaps - Navigate the gaps list
- Creating Workflows - Build remediation plans
- Uploading Documents - Trigger gap analysis