PartnerAlly Docs
AI Governance

Bias Assessments

Review AI bias testing results and fairness measures.

Bias Assessments

Bias assessments help ensure AI operates fairly across different organizations, industries, and compliance scenarios. This page explains PartnerAlly's approach to AI fairness.

Why Bias Assessment Matters

AI systems can inadvertently:

  • Favor certain document types
  • Miss gaps in specific industries
  • Under/over-weight certain frameworks
  • Produce inconsistent results

Bias assessment is a continuous process, not a one-time check. We regularly evaluate and improve AI fairness.

Types of Bias We Monitor

Document Bias

Ensuring AI works well across:

  • Different document formats
  • Various writing styles
  • Multiple languages (where supported)
  • Different policy structures

Industry Bias

Preventing favoritism toward:

  • Specific industries
  • Organization sizes
  • Business models
  • Geographic regions

Framework Bias

Ensuring balanced treatment of:

  • All supported frameworks
  • Different control types
  • Various compliance maturity levels

Confidence Calibration

Ensuring confidence scores are:

  • Accurately calibrated
  • Consistent across scenarios
  • Not systematically over/under-confident

Viewing Bias Assessments

Go to AI Governance

Navigate to the AI Governance section.

Click "Bias Assessments"

Opens the assessment dashboard.

Review Latest Results

See current assessment status.

Assessment Dashboard

Overall Fairness Score

A summary metric showing:

  • Overall bias assessment result
  • Trend over time
  • Areas of concern (if any)

Category Breakdown

CategoryWhat's Measured
Document FairnessPerformance across document types
Industry FairnessConsistency across industries
Framework FairnessBalance across frameworks
Confidence AccuracyCalibration of confidence scores

Trend Charts

See how fairness evolves:

  • Historical scores
  • Improvement trends
  • Issue identification

Understanding Results

Score Interpretation

Score RangeMeaning
90-100%Excellent fairness
75-89%Good, minor areas to watch
50-74%Moderate, improvements underway
Below 50%Concerns, active mitigation

Detailed Findings

For each category:

  • Specific findings
  • Data supporting the assessment
  • Mitigation measures in place
  • Improvement roadmap

Testing Methodology

How We Test

MethodPurpose
Benchmark DatasetsStandard test cases across scenarios
A/B TestingCompare model versions
User FeedbackIncorporate real-world corrections
Statistical AnalysisIdentify systematic patterns

Testing Frequency

  • Major assessments: Quarterly
  • Continuous monitoring: Ongoing
  • After model updates: Always
  • Ad-hoc investigations: As needed

Mitigation Measures

When Bias Is Found

If bias is identified:

Detection

Bias is identified through testing or feedback.

Analysis

Root cause is determined.

Mitigation

Corrective measures are implemented.

Validation

Improvement is verified.

Monitoring

Ongoing tracking ensures resolution.

Mitigation Types

TypeDescription
Training DataAdjust data balance
Model TuningModify model parameters
Post-ProcessingApply fairness corrections
Human ReviewAdd oversight for affected areas

Bias mitigation is an ongoing process. As new scenarios emerge, continued monitoring and adjustment is required.

Your Organization's Data

How Your Data Is Used

Your organization's data:

  • Is not used to train models without consent
  • May contribute to anonymized statistics
  • Is protected by data handling policies
  • Remains under your control

Opt-Out Options

You can choose to:

  • Exclude data from aggregate analysis
  • Receive additional AI disclosures
  • Request manual review of AI outputs

Reporting Bias Concerns

If You Suspect Bias

Report potential bias issues:

Document the Concern

Note what seems biased and why.

Report to Support

Use the feedback mechanism or contact support.

We Investigate

Reports are reviewed by our AI team.

Resolution

You're informed of findings and actions.

What to Include

When reporting:

  • Specific examples
  • Expected vs. actual behavior
  • Patterns you've noticed
  • Impact on your work

Fairness Commitments

Our Principles

We commit to:

  • Regular, transparent bias assessment
  • Prompt response to identified issues
  • Continuous improvement
  • Clear communication about limitations

Ongoing Work

Current focus areas:

  • Expanding industry coverage
  • Improving cross-framework consistency
  • Enhancing confidence calibration
  • Reducing document format sensitivity

Documentation for Audits

Available Documentation

For audit purposes:

  • Latest bias assessment reports
  • Testing methodology documentation
  • Mitigation history
  • Fairness monitoring approach

Requesting Documentation

To request detailed documentation:

  1. Contact your account team
  2. Specify audit requirements
  3. Receive relevant materials
  4. Schedule technical discussion if needed

Common Questions

How often are assessments performed?

  • Full assessments: Quarterly
  • Continuous monitoring: Always on
  • After changes: Every model update

Can I see assessments specific to my industry?

Where sufficient data exists, industry-specific fairness metrics may be available. Contact support for details.

What if AI consistently gets something wrong for my organization?

Report it:

  • We investigate organization-specific patterns
  • May indicate unique factors
  • Helps improve for similar organizations
  • You may receive adjusted recommendations

Are assessment results audited externally?

We pursue independent reviews:

  • Annual third-party assessments
  • Results inform improvements
  • Summary available on request

Next Steps

On this page